Description

((You should take some information from Cann, Kempson and Gregoromichelaki’s book and Saeed;s book, ))

((And the reference list should be in Harvard style, Don’t Forget to add links for every reference))

Select ((just one ))of the more specific topics given below. In order to do so you should provide a dataset from a specific language you are familiar with (no more than 5 sentences) and discuss one of the following topics, highlighting any advantages or disadvantages the analysis has:

1. Analyse your dataset, explaining how type theory and lambda calculus overcome the difficulties we find in first order predicate logic. In your account provide comprehensive examples of two/three place predicates and how they can be analysed in this logic.

2. Analyse your dataset, discussing how Generalised Quantifier Theory overcomes the difficulties in the analysis of quantified NPs in first order predicate logic. Does this analysis manage to capture the meaning of NPs in a uniform and comprehensive way?

3. Analyse your dataset, giving an account of Anaphora in DRT. Provide a detailed discussion of any strengths and/or weaknesses associated with this approach.

4. Analyse your dataset, explaining how the DRT mechanism accounts for Tense and Aspect, giving particular emphasis on the temporal relations introduced. What is the main strength of this approach compared to the Does tense logic approach?

Also, please take in consideration that My instructor have read the essay you wrote and sent it back with some points to be fixed. I would like you please to edit the original essay you have written as I will upload the essay with the comments below.

This is the supervisor’s comment: ( also I will upload it in here plz find it in the attachments) 

Please find attached your draft with comments. Please have a look at Cann, Kempson and Gregoromichelaki’s book and Saeed;s book, be more focused in your discussion and don’t write anything you can not explain properly.

And open the file on PC so you would be able to see the comments on the essay.

The references should be in Harvard style please