Question Description

I’m working on a criminal justice discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Discussion post: America has undergone a tightening of security and argumentatively a lessoning of civil liberties due to the terrorists attacks of 9/11 and other terrorist activities. Is there a balancing point between our civil liberties and national security? How have these security interests affected the criminal procedural rights of suspected or known terrorists? What does this tell you about how public policy can dictate the mechanics of criminal law?