Consider the article: Chen, Z., Huang, Z., Li, X., Deng, W., Gao, M., Jin, M., … & Du, Q. (2023). Effects of traditional Chinese medicine combined with modern rehabilitation therapies on motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, 1097477. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1097477/full
Is this quantitative study a systematic review? Why is it considered a systematic review?
Where Does the Study Fall in The Hierarchy of Evidence in Terms of Reliability and Risk of Bias?
Why was the study done (Define the problem and purpose)