Description
Peer Review
Overview:
Peer review is a skill with practical application. Both the writer and reviewer benefit. Peer review provides the writer with valuable constructive information to strengthen the work, while the reviewer often recognizes strengths and weaknesses in their own writing after reading and responding to a peer.
WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT:
You were instructed in week 5 to submit a copy of your rough draft to this forum. If you have not done so, please submit a copy as an attachment in a new thread with your name as the subject.
You will also submit two peer reviews to your peers.
REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
Choose two different peer rough drafts to evaluate Choose drafts that have not been reviewed yet if available.
Use the peer review rubric to provide constructive feedback, incorporating specific, positive remarks as well as helpful suggestions so your peer can see you genuinely evaluated their rough draft. Peer Review Rubric
You will provide this feedback as an attachment back to the two peers rough draft posts.
I will provide 2 drafts to review from different peers.
Peer Review Rubric
Meets or Exceeds Established Assignment Criteria
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
An introduction with a clear thesis statement |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Project includes all required topics: Community Organization, Community Partnerships, Cross-Cultural Challenges, Humanitarian Considerations, Volunteers, Roadblocks, Future Vision, Challenges, and Improvements |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Meets project presentation requirements: Paper 5-7 pages Presentation – 8-10 minutes presentation including visual elements (graphics, pictures, etc.), 150-200 notes per slide, and recorded voice Speech – 8-10 minutes and a written script of the narrative |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
Clearly Presents Well-Reasoned Ideas and Concepts
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Evidence supporting claims cited throughout the project |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Used a minimum of 10 reputable sources |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
Quality of Project
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Academic and professional tone and appearance |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Grammar and proofreading |
10 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
Conclusion
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Total |
100 |
Fill in |
Provide an overall conclusion and impression of your peers paper. What did your peer do right? What could they improve? This should include recommendations and constructive comments to help your peer improve.
